Search foundations
HTTP status, HTTPS, document title, meta description, one clear primary heading, canonical address, language alternates and XML sitemap signals are checked as separate conditions.
SEARCH & AI AUTHORITY / DIAGNOSTIC 01
See what search engines and AI systems can actually read.
Enter a public URL. NobleJackal examines its search foundation, AI discovery signals and evidential clarity without pretending that one score can predict a ranking.
AUDIT SCOPE / WHAT IS TESTED
A free website audit for search engines and AI crawlers.
The diagnostic reads the public version of one URL. It checks whether a search engine or answer system can retrieve the page, understand its purpose and connect its claims to a visible source. It does not estimate traffic or turn a technical checklist into a ranking prediction.AI crawler access
The audit reads public robots rules for Google, OpenAI, GPT, Claude and Perplexity user agents. It also checks whether meaningful text is present in the server response rather than appearing only after client-side execution.
Entity and evidence
Structured data, organisation identity and evidence language are examined together. Schema markup cannot repair a page whose visible text does not identify the responsible organisation or support its claims.
Performance context
When Google PageSpeed Insights and Lighthouse data are available, the report includes the observed performance result. An unavailable measurement is marked as unavailable; it is never replaced with an invented number.
READING THE RESULT
A readiness score is a map of the next checks, not a verdict.
A pass means the named public signal was present when the URL was inspected. It does not prove that Google has indexed the page or that an AI system will quote it.
A warning usually means the signal exists but needs review: a weak description, ambiguous entity information, incomplete language relationships or evidence that cannot be traced from the claim.
A blocked result points to a retrieval or configuration problem. Some crawler restrictions are deliberate governance choices. The audit reports the condition; it does not assume that every bot should be allowed.
COMMON FAILURE MODES
The faults that most often prevent useful retrieval.
Conflicting addresses
Redirect chains, inconsistent canonicals and broken hreflang clusters make it harder to decide which URL owns the answer.
Invisible primary content
A page may look complete in a browser while its initial HTML contains little more than a shell. Search and answer systems need retrievable text, headings and links.
Unverifiable authority
Claims without a named author, responsible organisation, publication record or inspectable source remain difficult to trust even when the page is technically crawlable.
QUESTIONS BEFORE YOU USE THE TOOL
What this GEO and AI website audit can—and cannot—tell you.
01Is the AI crawler website audit free?+
Yes. The public diagnostic does not require an email address. To protect the service from automated abuse, one analysis is available per IP address every 24 hours.
02Is this a content optimisation tool for AI search engines?+
It does not rewrite pages, manufacture keywords or publish content. It identifies access, semantics, entity and evidence gaps that should be resolved before editorial work is commissioned.
03Can the score guarantee a Google ranking or an AI citation?+
No. The score describes observable readiness signals at one point in time. Indexing, ranking, citation and recommendation are separate outcomes controlled by external systems.
04Which URL should I test first?+
Start with the canonical page that should answer the commercial or informational query—not automatically the homepage. Then test the homepage and any language equivalent that supports the same decision.
05What should happen after the audit?+
Confirm the finding manually, set the correct page role, repair technical access or entity evidence, and measure the affected query and page as a dated cohort. Do not respond by publishing dozens of near-duplicate pages.